You begin by telling SueYouToo what happened in your own words. The system guides you to describe the situation clearly so it can understand the facts that matter most.
Not usually. The system interprets your narrative as you provide it, without requiring lengthy questionnaires.
Yes. The platform generates both a validity score and a success rate score to help you understand how strong your claim may be.
Yes. The platform shows the legal reasoning behind your score and allows you to refresh to see additional case references and explanations.
You can choose to move forward independently or connect with a legal professional. The platform lets you decide the best next step for your situation.
Yes. You may request support from a firm or attorney directly through the platform if you choose to proceed with representation.
The platform supports both real disputes and hypothetical learning scenarios.
Yes. The platform includes badges, progress tracking, and supportive learning features to make the experience more engaging.
Yes. Refreshing your case will reveal additional reasoning and references for clearer understanding.
No. The system is designed to be accessible and understandable for users with no legal background.
You provide a clear description of what happened, key dates, involved parties, and any supporting details you can recall. No legal terminology is required.
Instantly! Our platform uses an advanced, custom local RAG artificial intelligence system.
Your report includes a likelihood score, relevant legal principles, and suggested next steps. Detailed reasoning is included to help you understand the assessment.
Free reviews or your free trials provide a basic score and summary. Paid submissions provide expanded analysis, documentation guidance, and exportable reports.
Yes. Case summaries and structured reports can be downloaded once unlocked through a paid submission or bundle plan.
Individuals can purchase case-submission credits in small bundles. Firms have subscription-based pricing with additional service features.
No subscription is required. Individuals pay only for the cases they choose to process.
Yes. Professional accounts include administrative dashboards, reporting tools, and lead-routing features.
You receive practical, step-by-step suggestions tailored to your situation. You may then choose to proceed independently or connect with legal counsel.
Yes. Users may update their information and generate a revised analysis when circumstances change.
Yes. The platform identifies commonly relevant documentation and suggests how to organize supporting materials.
Yes. Filing guidance is provided in structured steps based on typical civil procedure.
Yes. The platform includes educational modules and clarity guides for legal learning.
Yes. Users can submit hypothetical cases to learn how case reasoning works.
Yes. Individual users may run an initial free case review to explore how the platform works before purchasing additional submissions.
They can receive potential cases, contribute educational content, or use the system for initial case review.
Yes, leads are matched based on case strength and practice area.
It supports exporting assessments for intake or CRM use.
It provides an informed starting point for professional review.
Yes, firms may adjust categories to align with their practice focus.
It demonstrates legal reasoning in structured, example-based formats.
Yes, by pre-explaining key case factors before the first conversation.
Yes, summaries can be generated for firm systems.
Yes, it helps clients understand expectations before legal action.
It avoids legal advice and frames all results as educational guidance.
Yes, although legal variation is noted in explanations.
Yes, professionals may contribute legal clarifications or examples.
No, it provides guidance only. Document creation remains with attorneys.
Yes, professional feedback is encouraged for accuracy.
Yes, enterprise partnerships and integrations are supported.
It explains legal ideas in clear, structured steps to build confidence.
Yes, core legal areas are simplified using real examples.
Yes, real and sample cases are included for learning comparison.
Complex terms are translated into everyday language with examples.
Yes, it reinforces core principles that appear in assessments.
It shows how to organize reasoning and apply rules to facts.
Yes, hypothetical scenarios allow safe practice.
It encourages repetition and learning through progress markers.
Yes, classrooms and study groups can use shared learning modules.
Yes, it explains how judges analyze and weigh details.
It models how to connect facts, rules, and conclusions.
Yes, references are simplified and shown in plain English.
Yes, it is suitable for pre-law and high school introduction.
Yes, short challenges reinforce key lessons.
Yes, comparing outcomes teaches how facts influence cases.
The platform provides structured case summaries and scoring models that assist attorneys in determining matter viability and strategic direction.
Yes. The likelihood score assists firms in allocating time and resources to cases with substantive legal viability.
Yes. Clients arrive with foundational understanding, enabling consultations to begin at a more advanced stage of legal analysis.
Yes. Firms can receive organized matter summaries prior to any direct communication with the client.
The platform collects structured narrative, dates, parties, and contextual analysis relevant to preliminary legal evaluation.
Yes. Integration options allow case summaries to be synced with existing firm systems.
Yes. Firm accounts include dashboard access for monitoring inbound cases and team workflows.
A percentage-based referral fee applies when a firm accepts and engages a client, subject to jurisdictional rules.
Yes. Case category and specialty filters can be configured within the account settings.
Yes. The structured reasoning framework serves as a consistent teaching tool for developing evaluation skills.
Yes. The educational components help clients understand legal standards and realistic case outcomes.
Yes. Certain plans permit branding adjustments for internal or client-facing report presentation.
No. Free trials are limited to individual users. Law firms access the platform through paid professional tiers.
SueYouToo uses AI case analysis to evaluate your situation against legal principles and case patterns. It provides a clear explanation of where your case stands so you can understand your options before seeking legal advice.
Unlike traditional legal tools, SueYouToo focuses on clarity, guidance, and learning. It uses gamified, friendly explanations instead of dense legal jargon.
SueYouToo is designed for everyday users, students, and professionals who want a clear understanding of potential legal claims without needing prior legal knowledge.
The platform breaks legal processes into step-by-step explanations. It simplifies complex legal steps so users can understand what typically happens in a dispute.
Case grading refers to evaluating the strength of a case based on legal rules, prior outcomes, and fact patterns. It provides an initial sense of direction before consulting a lawyer.
Yes. The system identifies whether your facts match common legal criteria and explains why the claim may or may not be strong.
SueYouToo is an educational platform, not a law firm. It explains legal scenarios but does not represent users or provide legal advice.
The score is created using legal data models based on how similar claims have performed historically. It indicates general likelihood, not a guaranteed result.
It covers contract disputes, workplace issues, consumer complaints, property issues, defamation, and more.
Yes, the platform is designed to help users understand legal reasoning in a clear and approachable way.
It provides both. Core concepts are explained simply, and your case submission receives tailored reasoning based on your details.
Yes, it is designed to be understandable and supportive even for complete beginners.
It provides organized legal guidance, explanations, learning tools, and optional attorney connection resources.
Yes. It outlines typical steps such as documenting evidence, negotiation, and when legal representation might be useful.
Legal topics can feel overwhelming, so the platform uses supportive tone, interactive features, and learning progress tools to make the experience easier.
The system is most effective with civil claims, including employment issues, contracts, landlord/tenant disputes, consumer complaints, and property-related conflicts.
You answer guided questions describing your situation. The platform then evaluates the legal elements involved.
It is based on legal reasoning patterns and past outcomes. It is educational, not a legal ruling or guarantee.
It estimates how strong your claim might be compared to typical legal standards and case outcomes.
The system draws from statutes, common legal principles, and documented case results.
It analyzes the factual elements you provide and compares them to patterns seen in historical cases.
Yes. It highlights supportive facts and areas that may need stronger evidence.
Yes, it provides general steps such as documentation, negotiation, and when to contact an attorney.
Estimates are based on public settlement data and general case categories, not exact predictions.
Small factual differences, evidence availability, and jurisdiction rules can change outcomes.
Yes. You may refine and resubmit your case to explore different legal angles.
Yes, it identifies key supporting information commonly needed in similar claims.
Yes, it can evaluate business and contractual disputes as well as individual claims.
You may still take steps to gather evidence or seek legal advice. Weak does not mean impossible.
Yes, context is reviewed alongside legal elements, though outcomes still depend on provable facts.
Data is protected using secure encryption and controlled system access.
Stored information helps maintain case continuity and can be deleted upon request.
Yes, you can begin without sharing identifying details.
No. Information is only shared if you request attorney connection.
It follows industry-level security standards and continuous monitoring.
Yes, you can request removal at any time.
Yes, it adheres to major data protection requirements.
Most are AI-reviewed, with optional human oversight for improvement.
It uses login authentication, encryption, and internal access controls.
Yes. Uploaded files are encrypted and stored securely.
No tracking is required unless you request attorney contact.
Yes, especially when exploring scenarios before seeking legal advice.
Only minimal navigation data is collected to improve user experience.
Additional safety protections ensure appropriate platform use and supervision when needed.
All data practices are clearly explained in the privacy policy.
Yes, the platform can outline possible resolution paths before escalation.
They can use neutral guidance to support fair complaint evaluation.
Yes, it highlights potential exposure areas to review further.
Yes, it can clarify contractual disagreement points.
Yes, it helps teams understand legal obligations and policies.
Yes, it assists in evaluating harassment or policy violation claims.
Scenario testing helps organizations prepare balanced responses.
Yes, it outlines when alternative resolution may be more practical than litigation.
Yes, it helps identify cases that may require faster attention.
Yes, especially when internal legal resources are limited.
Patterns can be identified across submissions for broader insights.
Yes, summaries can assist in internal review processes.
Yes, it provides guidance on when professional representation is appropriate.
It provides unbiased, information-based evaluation steps.
Yes, the platform is designed for clarity and ease of understanding.
Progress markers and goals make learning legal reasoning more engaging and less intimidating.
They guide users through questions in conversational, supportive steps.
Progress badges appear as understanding deepens through use.
Achievements recognize case insight milestones and continuous learning.
It builds confidence by introducing concepts gradually.
Users practice reasoning by selecting legal interpretations in context.
It retrieves actual legal sources before generating explanations, improving reliability.
Statutes, case summaries, and trusted legal reference materials.
Yes, the platform explains how it arrived at its conclusions.
Yes, comparing outcomes teaches how facts change legal evaluation.
It replaces complex legal language with friendly learning cues.
Yes, users can track progress as their understanding improves.
Yes, optional deeper reasoning puzzles are included.
Yes, learning history and growth indicators are stored.
Instead of requiring interpretation, the platform explains reasoning clearly.
SueYouToo can help evaluate situations involving hacking, unauthorized access, data theft, online harassment, identity misuse, and digital fraud. The platform explains common legal principles used in cyber-related disputes.
Yes. The platform outlines typical steps, such as documenting account changes, securing devices, and when reporting to authorities or legal counsel may be appropriate.
Yes, it provides clear explanations of how online harassment is evaluated legally and when behavior may qualify as a civil or criminal violation.
Yes. The platform can help explain identity misuse, defamation risks, and what evidence is commonly relevant in such disputes.
The platform outlines typical response steps, internal documentation strategies, and when regulatory reporting or legal counsel may be needed.
Yes. It provides general guidance on when incidents rise to a severity level that typically requires police or cybercrime authority involvement.
Yes. It helps clarify legal definitions of digital ownership and steps commonly taken in intellectual property disputes.
Yes, it draws from known legal outcomes and comparable fact patterns to provide a contextual understanding of possible interpretations.
It explains what digital evidence usually matters most, such as logs, timestamps, message histories, or access patterns.
Yes. The platform outlines common dispute points, responsible parties, and when external investigation may be needed.
Yes. It can be used as part of compliance and internal awareness training on digital risk and reporting responsibilities.
Yes, it explains how jurisdiction affects cyber disputes and what factors determine where cases may be filed or reported.
Yes, it provides general educational estimates based on similar case outcomes, though actual results vary by situation and proof.
Often yes. The system explains alternative pathways like mediation, negotiation, or platform-level dispute processes.
It simplifies technical language and breaks legal reasoning into step-by-step explanations, helping users feel informed and confident.